#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER MANUAL ISO#

The tilting screen is exactly the wrong implementation, whereas the X100V is exactly right if you want a tilting screen at all. Next to a number of improvements (faster AF, better EVF, placement of the diopter adjustment and exposure comp dial) there are some crucial misses for me: the sub screen is nothing but a gimmick and looks cheap on this camera. The X-Pro3 indeed misses the point for me. For professional work I've moved away from Fujifilm, but for personal work I still love the X-Pro2 form factor. I hope that you will find both of the tests useful. I got the same file but only for ISO200/6400 and I applied various IXT recipes, famous in Fuji user community:ДЄt this stage I don't want to bias you with my findings and this is the reason I will not express any opinion yet.

#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER MANUAL ISO#

You will find the test files for ISO 200/800/1600/3200/6400/12800 in the link below:ДЄnd some information about the settings used:

Everything else is in default settings and with default color profiles. Trying to focus on the demosaicing part of post processing, I disabled sharpening, noise reduction and lens corrections. I got the RAF files from this dpreview test: Being an owner of an X-T20 and trying to find the best possible workflow quality wise, I decided to do some tests. I am new to the forum and new to the Fuji family.

Iridient x-transformer manual